Business Litigation, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Government Contracts, Intellectual Property Litigation, Real Estate: Consumer
Arbitration
Joseph B. Teig, an accomplished attorney at Cox Padmore Skolnik & Shakarchy LLP in New York City, possesses a profound expertise in the field of business law. His legal practice encompasses a wide array of areas, including commercial litigation, real estate disputes, contract breaches, intellectual property matters, property damage claims, royalty disputes, licensing issues, and various other commercial legal challenges.
Mr. Teig extends his legal services to a diverse clientele, ranging from large corporations to individual entrepreneurs. He diligently represents their interests in both federal and state courts, as well as before various arbitration panels. With his adept legal skills, he frequently assumes the roles of lead counsel and appellate counsel, overseeing various legal proceedings, conducting cross-examinations, and meticulously crafting essential legal documents. His outstanding legal acumen is reflected in his “Very Good” rating on Avvo.
Having pursued a bachelor’s degree in economics at Yale University in Connecticut in 1981, Mr. Teig’s academic foundation is deeply rooted in economics. After more than two decades, he embarked on a journey to further his education, culminating in the acquisition of his Juris Doctor degree from the Fordham University School of Law in 2007. Notably, he graduated with magna cum laude honors, consistently achieving recognition on the dean’s list for his exceptional academic performance and earning induction into the esteemed Order of the Coif.
Mr. Teig’s extensive background in economics, underscored by his undergraduate degree, equips him with a solid framework for comprehending the economic facets of legal matters and skillfully navigating the intricacies of business law. He not only possesses the capacity to dissect the issues at hand but can also evaluate various legal scenarios, identify potential challenges and risks, and devise effective strategies tailored to his clients’ objectives. He ardently believes that not all cases necessitate litigation and actively promotes alternative dispute resolution methods such as negotiation and mediation, thereby assisting clients in managing their legal expenses more efficiently.